Difference: TaskPhot (1 vs. 2)

Revision 22017-11-14 - JakobNordin

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="CosmologyWorkingGroup"
Deleted:
<
<
 

Status of calibration and photometry

Changed:
<
<		The work with achieving a final, calibrated SN sample should be continuous. The most critical part is the photometric calibration, followed by the candidate modeling and code used to perform lightcurve fits.
>
>		Leading the work towards achieving a final, calibrated SN sample. This should start early, and then continuously identify the limiting factors on the current sample. What are the most immediate tasks (pre-processing, calibration, host-z, extraction)?

Possible tools

  • A way to present an updated view on the current quality of the ZTF SN sample. Separating the contributions from calibration (evaluated eg from stars), extractions (eg through comparing lightcurves with and without host contamination). What SNe are currently lacking host redshifts and where are the host subtractions uncertain.
  • Daily atmospheric solution.
  • SED based flatfielding (through the dome LED lights).
  • Implement the extraction ("scene mode") methods of Paris/Weizmann.
 

-- JakobNordin - 14 Nov 2017 \ No newline at end of file

Revision 12017-11-14 - JakobNordin

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="CosmologyWorkingGroup"

Status of calibration and photometry

The work with achieving a final, calibrated SN sample should be continuous. The most critical part is the photometric calibration, followed by the candidate modeling and code used to perform lightcurve fits.

-- JakobNordin - 14 Nov 2017

View topic | History: r2 < r1 | More topic actions...
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback