Difference: GCNCIRCULAR20742 ( vs. 1)

E. Burns (UAH) reports on behalf of the GBM-LIGO Group: Lindy Blackburn (CfA), Michael S. Briggs (UAH), Jacob Broida (Carleton College), Jordan Camp (NASA/GSFC), Tito Dal Canton (NASA/GSFC), Nelson Christensen (Carleton College), Valerie Connaughton (USRA), Adam Goldstein (USRA), Rachel Hamburg (UAH), C. Michelle Hui (NASA/MSFC), Pete Jenke (UAH), Dan Kocevski (NASA/MSFC), Nicolas Leroy (LAL), Tyson Littenberg (NASA/MSFC), Julie McEnery (NASA/GSFC), Rob Preece (UAH), Judith Racusin (NASA/GSFC), Peter Shawhan (UMD), Karelle Siellez (GA Tech), Leo Singer (NASA/GSFC), John Veitch (Birmingham), Peter Veres (UAH), Colleen Wilson-Hodge (NASA/MSFC)

GBM was observing 81% of the LIGO probability map for G275404 at the event time, with much of the northern high probability region and half of the southern arc observed. There is no GBM on-board trigger around the event time. The untargeted ground-based search of GBM data for short-duration GRBs (Briggs et al., in prep) found no candidates close in time to G275404. The targeted search of the GBM data ([1], [2]) also did not find a significant gamma-ray signal. This search processes time scales of 0.256 to 8.192 s within 30 s of the LIGO event. No interesting gamma-ray candidate was found within this time window.

Any prompt gamma-ray burst emission, above the GBM detection threshold, must have been occulted by the Earth for Fermi. The Earth-occulted region is a circle with radius of 68 degrees, centered on RA, Dec = 134.5, +25.6.

Further analysis and upper limits will be reported later.

[1] L. Blackburn et al. 2015, ApjS 217, 8 [2] A. Goldstein et al. arXiv:1612.02395

-- ThomasKupfer - 27 Feb 2017