Difference: TargetsOfOpportunity ( vs. 1)

Revision 12017-08-07 - LeoSinger

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"

Targets of Opportunity

Mechanisms from Other Facilities

Facility/Telescope
<-- -->
Sorted descending
Method Pros Cons
LCOGT REST interface Powerful, simple to integrate with other pipelines, easy to control manually. Open source on GitHub! Specialized for LCOGT telescopes
iPTF CSV in e-mail Easy to control manually Feedback is slow, interface is ad hoc, monitoring status is difficult, web user interface is separate

Scheduler feature requirements

  • Submission
    • Program ID and sub-program/target name
    • List of fields & priorities
    • Cadence, filters, exposure time
  • Management
    • Cancel entire sub-program
    • Modify list of fields, cadence, priorities, exposure time, filters
  • Monitoring
    • List predicted observation timeline
    • List as-observed observation timeline
    • List all active sub-programs

Marshal feature requirements

  • Ingest GCNs
  • HEALPix-based spatial querying or annotation
  • Visualize localization, fields, candidates
  • Invoke optimal tiling and compare different plans with different assumptions about cadence, exposure time, etc.
  • Manually edit observing plan
  • Annotate and filter candidates according to numeric rubric (similar to Swift XRT scheme)
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback