Difference: TargetsOfOpportunity ( vs. 1)

Revision 12017-08-07 - LeoSinger

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"

Targets of Opportunity

Mechanisms from Other Facilities

Facility/Telescope Method Pros Cons
iPTF CSV in e-mail Easy to control manually Feedback is slow, interface is ad hoc, monitoring status is difficult, web user interface is separate
LCOGT REST interface Powerful, simple to integrate with other pipelines, easy to control manually. Open source on GitHub! Specialized for LCOGT telescopes

Scheduler feature requirements

  • Submission
    • Program ID and sub-program/target name
    • List of fields & priorities
    • Cadence, filters, exposure time
  • Management
    • Cancel entire sub-program
    • Modify list of fields, cadence, priorities, exposure time, filters
  • Monitoring
    • List predicted observation timeline
    • List as-observed observation timeline
    • List all active sub-programs

Marshal feature requirements

  • Ingest GCNs
  • HEALPix-based spatial querying or annotation
  • Visualize localization, fields, candidates
  • Invoke optimal tiling and compare different plans with different assumptions about cadence, exposure time, etc.
  • Manually edit observing plan
  • Annotate and filter candidates according to numeric rubric (similar to Swift XRT scheme)
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback